Which type of contract can still be binding even if made without consideration when it is made under seal?

A contract that is made under seal can indeed be binding even if it lacks consideration. Contracts typically require consideration—something of value exchanged between parties—to be enforceable. However, contracts executed under seal are treated differently in many legal systems. The presence of a seal signifies the intent of the parties to create a formal and binding obligation, which allows the contract to be enforceable despite the absence of consideration.

In this context, a binding contract without consideration refers specifically to this concept of contracts under seal being recognized as having legal weight, thus making it enforceable. This principle is important because it allows for certain agreements to hold up in court, reflecting the understanding that the formality of sealing carries significant meaning and legal implications, even in the absence of a traditional exchange of value.

Other options do not accurately capture this important aspect of contract law related to contracts made under seal. For example, an enforceable contract typically implies there is consideration involved. Implied contracts generally arise from actions or circumstances rather than explicit agreement, thus they are not relevant to this question about sealed contracts. An accountable agreement is not a standard legal term recognized in contract law in this context.